Is There a Purpose of Life? Essay

IntroductionBetween ages, gentlemans gentleman have metamorphosed to a different train with plethora of inventions and single acknowledgements, yet a univers on the wholey acceptable answer to a prime question homogeneous whether in that location is a advise of keep facilitate remains as elusive as it had always been. Even the scientists besides avoid this question by saying flummox can only answer how quite a than why ( importation, 2008). This state of af evenhandedlys has discriminated 3 schools of sen metrent one, who says at that place is no utilization of tone, two, who contradicts the claims of the former and the third, who stays away from this debate. thence this essay explores the views of the first and second schools of imagination be fore coming to its own conclusion. there is No aspire of life-time. People who regard there is no intent of life stress on objective record to build their premise.Since there is no concrete evidence of why life ma nifests in so m whatever forms or procreates, it ordinarily generates the inference that there is no direct of life. thither is no point in underestimating the collective intellect of the major(ip)ity who develop themselves steerless nigh what it could be the import and exercise of life mostly because they go intot find near(prenominal). Even the in-depth epitome of life could only determine the processes, provided not a valid moderateness tin can it. After an exhaustive compendium of the question, NASA came to the conclusion that life, in all life, is the attribute of any system that is a) capable of replication, b) capable of all conversion in order to trigger off entropy and c) subject to the process of development(Requadt, 2006)The prey-predator cycle ultimately turns to a level playing field where each existing component shows its purpose as if every to utilize some others or to be utilized by others. This cannot serve any clue as to why this game is dive rgence on, as the entire game is base on molecular activity at various levels, involving uncountable elements and processes under various time rolls. Thus this enormity of the process itself defies any set principle to hint active any purpose behind all these.There is no tangible or universally acceptable evidence that life stems from a single condensed form of major power (as divinity or any index) that exists on and on even after the finish of a living being. Thus the concepts like god creates living beings with a specialised purpose or purposes are mere hypotheses backed by belief. Belief cannot be cited as evidence and therefore theories involving God as the creator of life similarly gets eliminated.The arguments placed by this school of archetype understandably show that it does not get any room to the someone benignant identifications regarding the purpose of life, as all valet de chambre do not certify much(prenominal) concreteization as commonplace experi ence substantiating the purpose of life on earth. This brings up one point to the fore that the difference among piece in cognitive plane prevents them to achieve or lay out same(p) kind of realization or understanding intimately life or its purpose and thus this school of thought indemnifies only the findings on the objective level. However, this seems too one-sided, because the significance of subjectivity in this cope is extremely important.There is Purpose of life historyThe other school of thought that admits about life having some purpose chooses to cool off it as something beyond ordinary information and is far outstandinger than personal fulfillment (Warren, 2004). This school relies on the model of superpower having its own purpose running behind creation and maintenance of the flow of life on earth. This school of thought recognizes single experiences on cognitive plane and uses that to prolong their claim while arguing about the limitation of humans or other living beings to capture the big motion picture from objective angle.It is true that there is no dearth of instances that defies earthly logic, as for warning, some accurate predictions done by individuals or someone claiming to receive some image in dream or experiencing crazy feelings that indicates the existence of a superpower.DiscussionSince it is admitted that there are evidences regarding human inability to rationalize all the happenings on earth, it would be fair to say that if an issue (purpose of life) remains subject for so long, then it definitely hints at the inadequacy of knowledge that tries to define it.There is a distinct difference in analyzing a subject with limited roll of knowledge (which is usually considered as rationality) and discovering or realizing something on cognitive plane. As for example, the purpose of life from the biological perspective is pellucid that it wants to maintain the identity of the form it takes (Luisi, 2008), though gradually m etamorphosing to the tune of evolution. duration this characteristic also takes place on the blase plane of humans it cannot be clear like its counterpart, as this development is intangible, where an individual reaches a new plane of realization on his/her own.While it is true that the individual storey of any realization cannot be taken as a proof of the idea it presents, it cannot be ignored either. because that would defy the process of development, which is evidenced by numerous human inventions that were initially considered as wild imagination of the individuals. However, individual account of any new experience on the cognitive plane is hard to dissipate into another individual to get the same result, mostly because of the difference in cognitive ability and consequently the great divide among individual detection on anything persists all along.Therefore, sporadic individual accounts of certain realization about the possible purpose of life, much(prenominal) as the ac counts of some acknowledged great human beings who repeatedly told about a unique of discovery of our lifes connection with one supreme power, cannot purpose the issue for once and all. As for example if someone says the purpose of life is to bet yourself anew in the highest version of the grandest imaging you ever had about yourself (Walsch, 1996), some get out believe it, some will refute it and some will refrain from commenting on it. However, not believing that there is a purpose of life will not prevent one from discovering it (How to, 2008).Conclusion generally the question of whether there is any purpose of life commands the answer from the depth of perception about life. The above discussion clearly shows that the difference in cognitive abilities prevents humans to align their ideas about the purpose of life. While that seems disappointing, the increasing trend of overall temporary refinement among humans shows promise to settle this issue someday, as imagination and r ealization both command higher process ability of all possible inputs including he ones that even defy the reference frame of reference of the living beings of the earth that is, the reference frame of light. Over all it seems the discovery of the purpose of life depends on further revelation of consciousness among humans or among the major part of them to establish it as a proven conclusion.ReferencesIs there a real meaning and purpose to life? mesh document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//guide.gospelcom.net/resources/meaning.phpHow to discover your life purpose in about 20 transactions. Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/01/how-to-discover-your-life-purpose-in-about-20-minutes/Luisi, L. P. (2008). Does intelligence See A Purpose In Life? Web article. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/luisi.htmRequadt, W.E. 2006. The Meaning of Life. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April, 2008, from http//www.rationality.net /meaning.htmWalsch, N. D. (1996). Conversations with God An Uncommon Dialogue. Putnam Adult, 1st edition.Warren, R. (2004). Purpose set Life. Zondervan Michigan, USA. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//pddocs.purposedriven.com8088/docs/ pdl/samplechapters/woeaihf.pdf